EPA to Public: Which Environmental Rules Are Bad? Public to EPA: Leave Those Rules Alone

Pam Wright
Published: May 17, 2017

Following President Donald Trump's February executive order instructing agencies to review which rules and regulations should be eliminated, replaced or modified, the Environmental Protection Agency asked the public for comments to help officials make those decisions.  

The agency received more than 26,000 responses by Monday when the comment period closed. While there were comments calling for the elimination of the EPA, the vast majority of comments implored the EPA to keep current regulations and do everything in its power to prevent a return to the polluted state of the country before the EPA was created. Many said more regulations are needed and not fewer to ensure the health of the country and the planet. 

"Please keep the regulations for air pollution and radiation," one commenter wrote. "These are common sense, and we should be doing even more to ensure good quality air and water for our future! We need regulation to keep our earth liveable!"

(MORE: EPA Removes Climate Science Website From Public View)

“Have we failed to learn from history, and forgotten the harm done to our air, water, and wetlands?” wrote Karen Sonnessa from New York. “If anything, regulations need to be more stringent. I remember the days of smog, pollution, and rivers spontaneously combusting. EPA is for the people.”

"Any act of lessening the power of the EPA is generally ludicrous," another wrote. "Funding the protection of our environment not only has benefits to people everywhere but takes into consideration generations to come. The world simply would not last if we were to ignore the environment which is a crucial part of a daily, monthly, and yearly cycle that helps our planet sustain itself. To digress, I love biodiversity, ecological homeostasis, and......oh yeah, OXYGEN!"

“Know your history or you’ll be doomed to repeat it,” another person wrote. “Environmental regulations came about for a reason. There is scientific reasoning behind the need for it. It is not a conspiracy to harm corporations. It’s an attempt to make the people’s lives better.”

"The EPA serves a necessary function in the protection of American people and wildlife," a person wrote. "All regulations should remain in place. Additionally, new regulations should be added to further secure clean drinking water for all people in this country as well as to protect wildlife species from extinction.

One person simply wrote the word "No" 1,665 times.

The EPA is one of several agencies – the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrative is another – that have been targeted by the Trump administration for significant budget cuts. Trump has proposed a 31 percent cut to the EPA and a 26 percent hit to the NOAA. Cuts to NOAA may seriously hinder timely and accurate weather forecasts and warnings, Jane Lubchenco, NOAA administrator under President Barack Obama, told weather.com.

(MORE: Trump's Plan to Slash NOAA Budget Puts Lives, Climate Research at Risk, Scientists Say)

Former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy called the proposed budget "a fantasy" that ignores the EPA's mission to protect public health.

"It shows the Trump administration doesn't hold the same American values for clean air, clean water and healthy land as the vast majority of its citizens," McCarthy said in a statement to the Associated Press. "Our health comes before the special interests of multibillion-dollar industries."

Members of the public who took the time to comment on the EPA site seemingly share McCarthy's views on regulations that were implemented to protect the planet and the health of its inhabitants. 

"I am strongly opposed to the elimination of EPA regulations," a commenter wrote. "Our government is our safety net, designed to make sure our air, water, and land are safe, clean, and plentiful. While this work needs to be done with economic growth in mind, the long-term sustainability of our earth must ultimately trump economic development needs."

MORE: Photos Reveal Pollution Before EPA

The Weather Company’s primary journalistic mission is to report on breaking weather news, the environment and the importance of science to our lives. This story does not necessarily represent the position of our parent company, IBM.

Featured Blogs

Meteorology of Saturday's Colombian Flood Disaster That Killed 254

By Dr. Jeff Masters
April 3, 2017

At least 254 people were killed in the in the city of Mocoa (population 40,000) in southwest Colombia near the border of Ecuador early Saturday, when torrential rains triggered a debris flow on a nearby mountain that surged into the town as a huge wall of water carrying tons of mud and debris. The disaster is the fourth deadliest weather-related disaster in Colombia’s recorded history.

Iconic American Destination Virtually Isolated for Rest of Year

By Christopher C. Burt
March 24, 2017

Half of the village of Big Sur, on the coast of central California, has lost its only access to the north following the demolition of the flood-damaged Pfeiffer Canyon Bridge along State Route 1 (also Rt. 1 or SR 1) on March 19. Although Rt. 1 to the south of Big Sur has reopened to traffic (after mud and rock slides were cleared) it is a long 70-mile journey along the windy but spectacular highway to Cambria, the next town of any significance where supplies can be had. CalTrans (California Department of Transportation) estimates it will take 6-9 months to rebuild a new bridge over the canyon.

An extraordinary meteorological event; was one of its results a 1000-year flood?

By Stu Ostro
October 5, 2015

The confluence of meteorological ingredients the first weekend in October 2015 resulted in an extraordinary weather event with severe impacts. Was one of them a 1000-year flood?

Why the Arrest of a Science-Loving 14-year-old Matters

By Shaun Tanner
September 16, 2015

By now, many of you have heard or read about the arrest of Ahmed Mohamed, a 14-year-old high school student from Irving, Texas. Ahmed was arrested because school officials called the police after he showed one of his teachers his homemade clock. Mistaken for a bomb, Ahmed was taken into custody, interrogated, shamed, suspended (still on suspension today, Wednesday), and reprimanded. All of this after it has been found that the "device" he brought to school was indeed, a homemade clock.