Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

Hurricane warnings for Baja; 94L forming spiral bands
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 3:36 PM GMT on August 31, 2009 +1
Hurricane warnings are in effect for the southern tip of Mexico's Baja Peninsula, where powerful Hurricane Jimena is expected to make landfall Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. The hurricane is in an environment with low wind shear, 5 - 10 knots, and warm Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs), 30°C. Shear is expected to remain low, and SSTs will decline to 28°C with a corresponding decrease in total oceanic heat content between now and landfall, and these conditions should mean that Jimena will be a Category 3 or 4 hurricane at landfall. Outer rain-bands of the hurricane will be appearing on Los Cabos radar soon, though the Mexican Weather Service web site has been hard to reach today. The computer models are split, with one camp calling for a landfall in southern Baja, and the other camp calling for landfall farther north near central Baja. The official NHC forecast splits the difference between these two solutions, and landfall could occur anywhere along a long stretch of the Baja coast. At this point, the UKMET model's solution taking Jimena westward out to sea is being discounted, since it is an outlier.

After Jimena makes initial landfall on Baja, it will cross over the Gulf of California and make landfall on Mainland Mexico. Depending upon how up along the coast this second landfall occurs, Arizona may receive moisture from Jimena late this week that will be capable of causing flooding rains.


Figure 1. Image of Hurricane Jimena taken by NASA'a MODIS instrument at 2020 UTC Sunday, 8/30/09.

Invest 94L
The well-organized tropical wave (94L) near 14.5N, 52W, about 500 miles east of the central Lesser Antilles Islands, continues to be a threat to develop into a tropical depression. Visible satellite imagery and this morning's QuikSCAT pass do not show a surface circulation yet, though 94L does have a large envelope of moisture and some modest heavy thunderstorm activity. QuikSCAT noted winds up to 30 mph. Water vapor satellite loops show that 94L has moistened the region surrounding it considerably, and dry air from the Saharan Air Layer is not a major impediment to development. Wind shear is a low 5 - 10 knots, and the ocean temperature are a moderately warm 28°C. Visible satellite loops over the past two hours show low-level spiral bands developing on 94L's northeast side, and I give a 70% chance the Hurricane Hunters will find a tropical depression or tropical storm on Tuesday when they investigate 94L.


Figure 2. Morning satellite image of 94L, showing low-level spiral bands developing on the northeast side.

The center of 94L probably passed over Buoy 41040, located at 14.5N, 53W over the past hour. Winds blew northeasterly early this morning, then went calm, then shifted to southerly late this morning. The winds were less than 10 knots during the center passage, so the circulation of 94L is not yet well-defined. The pressure fell significantly as 94L moved over the buoy (seen only after one removes the wiggles due to daily atmospheric tide effect present in the tropics). 94L will appear on Martinique radar on Tuesday.

The forecast for 94L
Shear will remain low, 5 -10 knots, over the next 5 days, SSTs will be warm, in the 28 - 29°C range, and dry air should have only a minor inhibiting effect, so I can't see anything that will prevent 94L from developing into a tropical depression over the next 1 - 2 days. The HWRF model develops 94L into a hurricane 4 days from now, as does the SHIPS intensity model, but other models, such as the GFDL, ECMWF, and GFS, do not develop 94L at all.

Model solutions for the track of 94L are divergent. Water vapor satellite loops show two upper-level lows to the north and northwest of 94L that are pulling the storm to the west-northwest, and 94L's motion is expected to range between the west-northwest and northwest over the next three days. By Tuesday, 94L will slow down from its current 15 mph forward speed to about 10 mph. Most of the models predict that the steering influence of the upper-level lows will pull 94L far enough north that the storm will miss the Lesser Antilles, with a closest approach occurring Wednesday and Thursday. However, the ECMWF and HWRF models have 94L passing within 200 miles of the islands, and the northern Lesser Antilles may experience tropical storm conditions on Thursday.

At the longer ranges, the fate of 94L is highly uncertain. The Canadian model turns 94L to the north near Bermuda, then out to sea, while the NOGAPS model foresees a threat to the U.S. East Coast early next week. Both of these solutions are believable. The Hurricane Hunters are scheduled to make their first flight into 94L on Tuesday afternoon at 2pm EDT.

Elsewhere in the Atlantic
The remains of an old cold front are bringing cloudiness and showers to the northern Gulf of Mexico and waters offshore North and South Carolina. The GFS and NAM models indicate an area of low pressure may develop along this old front near the Florida Panhandle or off the coast of North Carolina by Thursday. However, such a low may be extratropical and not tropical.

My next post will be between 3 - 5pm this afternoon.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 901 - 951

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25Blog Index

901. TreasureCoastFl 8:05 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting nrtiwlnvragn:
On the "impacts the whole state" discussion, it does indirectly. In Florida you pay a surcharge on your insurance policy, homeowners and vehicle for past hurricanes. Also in South Florida you pay a surcharge on your electric and phone bills for past hurricanes.

Not to mention the FP&L charges you paid even though you didn't have electricity for weeks. Never could figure that out..
Member Since: August 18, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 444
902. canesrule1 8:05 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:
An obvious spin and it continues its WNW movement.
903. TexasHurricane 8:05 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TropicalNonsense:
the United States Navy Forecast Model [NOGAPS] has it nailed with 94l. Dead On.

Soon the WU Servers are going to be heating up.



Huh? What are they sayong?
Member Since: July 2, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2811
904. TreasureCoastFl 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TexasHurricane:


here....

Aha! A comrade! (or comradette?) lol
Member Since: August 18, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 444
905. serialteg 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting bingcrosby:
Hurricane Trends After August 30th. Since we are halfway through the hurricane season, I thought this would be a good time to reflect with an article I found. We've had only 4 named storms this year with 1 making landfall with very minimal impact. However, if history proves correct, we are poised to see a dramatic increase in activity very shortly. The only 3 years since 2000 that had 4 named storms prior to September ended up producing on average 8-9 named storms for the second half of the season. Buckle up. It's about to be a bumpy ride.
Link


Ana went thru the Leewards and Puerto Rico, besides Claudette in the CONUS.
Member Since: August 22, 2006 Posts: 2 Comments: 1966
906. rwdobson 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting stormobserver:
I don't remember a time when all the models were pointing Bill to Florida. Ever.


At the time when Bill was still just a wave coming off Africa, the long term models did show Bill going toward Florida.
Member Since: June 12, 2002 Posts: 0 Comments: 1574
908. IKE 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting Txwxchaser:
852. IKE 7:54 PM GMT on August 31, 2009
Quoting Txwxchaser:
761. IKE 7:32 PM GMT on August 31, 2009
ECMWF is the most reliable model. If it shows 94L doing the same on the next couple of runs, I would bet my paycheck that is what will happen.

I'm not ready to say it is now, but if it shows it on a couple of more runs....


IKE...could you link for me please...thx



Link

thx IKE..question. This shows a recurve around 70-75 lat. Wouldn't it take a strong trough to push it N. so soon/suddenly. What do I know?



It looks like it shows a trough or a low, north of 94L, when it makes the turn. It shows a high north of it a day or two before it turns and then.....a dramatic turn after the high is completely eroded by what looks like a significant trough on September 8th.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
909. TexasHurricane 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
sorry,mistype...I meant what are they saying?
Member Since: July 2, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2811
911. kuppenskup 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Honestly, Im not trying to scare anyone but I see the two low pressure systems pulling off to the N & E in the next 72hrs with a strong high pressure gradiant moving in thereafter and with very little shear and a water temp of 81-82 degrees I would be a little concerned if I was a Florida resident right about now.
Member Since: August 26, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 404
912. tmangray 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
What's the furthest north on the Mexican Pacific coast a hurricane has made landfall I wonder.>>>

I'm not sure, but it couldn't be too far given the cold water, at least on the west coast. No hurricane has ever made landfall in California, although there is a murky and meager record from the 1800s of what may have been a hurricane in extratropical transition phasing with the passage of midlatitude trough off San Diego. Other than that, only a single tropical storm during the 1930s which came into LA. There was also the extraordinary extratropical remnant of a typhoon which affected the Oregon and Northern California coastline in 1962, the Columbus Day Storm. I actually recall that firsthand.
913. TheCaneWhisperer 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
94L seems to have lost some organization this evening.

Trend is re-curve this year, will it hold?


914. canesrule1 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TropicalNonsense:
the United States Navy Forecast Model [NOGAPS] has it nailed with 94l. Dead On.

Soon the WU Servers are going to be heating up.

interesting, watch out for JFV, might have a heart attack, lol, SFLA might just get the brunt.
915. hurricanejunky 8:06 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
?
Quoting CycloneOz:
I have arrived at Cabo San Lucas. My room has wifi...so I'll be attempting a live hurricane webcam...although I'm very limited on static shots at this hotel...I'm blocks away from the ocean.

Everything is okay, but Cabo-people are beginning to freak out a bit. There are huge lines of waiting cars for gas and grocery stores are packed. The only places that seem calm are the poorer villages to the east. Everyone there is just sitting around looking at the sky.

I'm very busy getting my equipment ready to go first thing in the morning...so not many updates between now and then.

Current conditions. Hot, humid, overcast, light rain...and no wind to speak of.

It is the calm...

CycloneOz---

You gotta be gettin' jacked up right about now. That's gonna be a helluva blow! We'll be praying for you...
Member Since: August 28, 2006 Posts: 6 Comments: 2875
916. TropicalNonsense 8:07 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TexasHurricane:


Huh? What are they saying?


Member Since: July 3, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 524
917. kuppenskup 8:07 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Looks like we could have 95L & 96L coming off the African Coast very shortly
Member Since: August 26, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 404
918. TreasureCoastFl 8:08 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting gtownTX:


What's ironic to me about RitaEvac's original statement about the whole state feeling a storm.......I'm in central Tx. and last year when I saw Hurr. Ike's massive size, I was sure that Ike would break the miserable drought and bring some much needed rain. We prepared for wind and big storm predictions.......Guess what?

Only a couple hours drive from the coast and we didn't even get a breeze much less a drop of rain. Fortunate for us, sadly tragic for those nearer the Gulf.

So yes, to say an entire state experience's a storm is just plain silly.(unless maybe you are in tiny Rhode Island or Delaware. LOL)


Well by watching it on tv, it appears as if it is actually covering the entire state. It's very decieving for people to watch who don't live where the storm is and are watching it on television.
Member Since: August 18, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 444
920. edmac 8:08 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
If Ike says it, it must be fact
Member Since: February 27, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 31
921. canesrule1 8:08 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting btwntx08:
895: no he wasn't
wow! that is sad.
Quoting TexasHurricane:


Huh? What are they sayong?
This model is suggesting a SFLA landfall, and this model is the Bible for the NHC, so that is what he means.
922. Bordonaro 8:08 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting StormChaser81:
No suit can protect a person against debre moving that fast, hes just asking to get hurt or worse by chasing storms for just video footage, Besides the footage hes not helping the scientific community. Hes risking other people lives when he gets in trouble and needs rescued. Personnly he about as sharp as a beach ball.

Yes, It's nice to have live coverage of a land falling hurricane! I hope this individual and his organization respects the fact that a CAT 4 OR 5 HURRICANE will be making landfall not too far from where he is at! I hope his suit is 2" titanium if he thinks he's gonna ride out 140-155MPH winds! I believe 155MPH winds will basically destroy almost anything standing except reinforced concrete!!
Member Since: August 25, 2009 Posts: 20 Comments: 6785
923. VentureH 8:09 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:


a good analogy is a forest fire, it may be destructive but it leads to bigger and better things.

True. Still no fun if you're the underbrush, though. No picnic for the trees either. But on the larger scale it tends to work out all right in the end.
Member Since: September 27, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 25
924. Barbados 8:09 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Which is correct?

18 GMT 08/31/09 15.6N 53.4W 25 1008 Invest
18 GMT 08/31/09 14.6N 53.4W 25 1008 Invest
Member Since: August 9, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 253
926. TexasHurricane 8:09 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TreasureCoastFl:

Aha! A comrade! (or comradette?) lol


:)
Member Since: July 2, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2811
928. canesrule1 8:09 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TheCaneWhisperer:
94L seems to have lost some organization this evening.

Trend is re-curve this year, will it hold?


These graphs are very misleading and should never be used, imo. I remember they told me a ULL had a surface circulation.
929. fmbill 8:10 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting TheCaneWhisperer:
94L seems to have lost some organization this evening.

Trend is re-curve this year, will it hold?




I think it is working on expanding its windfield.

Member Since: May 27, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 365
930. serialteg 8:10 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting tmangray:
What's the furthest north on the Mexican Pacific coast a hurricane has made landfall I wonder.>>>

I'm not sure, but it couldn't be too far given the cold water, at least on the west coast. No hurricane has ever made landfall in California, although there is a murky and meager record from the 1800s of what may have been a hurricane in extratropical transition phasing with the passage of midlatitude trough off San Diego. Other than that, only a single tropical storm during the 1930s which came into LA. There was also the extraordinary extratropical remnant of a typhoon which affected the Oregon and Northern California coastline in 1962, the Columbus Day Storm. I actually recall that firsthand.


That's why someone here said "I'll never see a cane in Texas after October" and I was wanting to post "I wouldn't use the word never...", especially in a place like the GOM.
Member Since: August 22, 2006 Posts: 2 Comments: 1966
931. SavannahStorm 8:11 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting canesrule1:
wow! that is sad.This model is suggesting a SFLA landfall, and this model is the Bible for the NHC, so that is what he means.


Actually, if you check the hi-res NOGAPS it suggests a landfall somewhere north of central Florida.
Member Since: September 22, 2005 Posts: 18 Comments: 2135
932. TropicalNonsense 8:11 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting canesrule1:
interesting, watch out for JFV, might have a heart attack, lol, SFLA might just get the brunt.



yeah really. but its about time we get a little potential tropical action!
the next few days will sure be interesting. especially if 94l blows up.

see ya when the action breaks canes.
Member Since: July 3, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 524
934. melwerle 8:11 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting StSimonsIslandGAGuy:
I've read about the San Diego hurricane in the 1850s--not going to look up the exact year now. But I was/am curious about what storm had made the northernmost landfall as a hurricane on the Mexican Pacific coast since good meteorological observations began. Thanks y'all!


StSimon - be quiet!! No hurricane in San Diego - they can't be following me.
Member Since: June 28, 2006 Posts: 12 Comments: 1837
936. largeeyes 8:11 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Cabo looks to peak at cat 1, MAYBE. Worst looks to go north...
Member Since: August 22, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 1381
937. chichswx 8:12 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting jeffs713:

What about the people who are filling in said hole, or rebuilding the house? They are increasing their wealth. Yes, things are being destroyed that were there before. But newer, more expensive things are being put into place. Many areas rebuild "bigger and better" after a wave of destruction. Many areas hit by Katrina are rebuilding to be more ecologically friendly, and more efficient. Same thing for areas hit by Ike. Not to mention, the people who are gaining the funds from rebuilding (construction, mostly) are injecting a good amount of their earnings back into the local economy.


Quoting 100l:



I agree with this completely!



Well, I and I'm sure many others on here disagree completely. This is one of the more callous things I've seen posted on here.
938. Ameister12 8:14 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
94L is heading in to some very heavy shear (30-50 kts).

Member Since: August 9, 2009 Posts: 9 Comments: 3517
939. TheCaneWhisperer 8:12 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting canesrule1:
These graphs are very misleading and should never be used, imo. I remember they told me a ULL had a surface circulation.



Those maps are not run on ULL's. Those are storm specific images that are accurate.
941. TreasureCoastFl 8:13 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting SavannahStorm:


Actually, if you check the hi-res NOGAPS it suggests a landfall somewhere north of central Florida.

Almost looks like it's curving back out at that point.. hard to tell.. But it's still way too early for any landfall predictions. IMO
Member Since: August 18, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 444
942. TropicalNonsense 8:13 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
NOGAPS Link
Member Since: July 3, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 524
943. nrtiwlnvragn 8:13 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting Barbados:
Which is correct?

18 GMT 08/31/09 15.6N 53.4W 25 1008 Invest
18 GMT 08/31/09 14.6N 53.4W 25 1008 Invest


14.6N 53.4W is the latest data.
Member Since: September 23, 2005 Posts: 11 Comments: 8923
944. canesrule1 8:13 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
If the dvorak classification is correct on where the COC is, then 94L is moving at 23MPH, lol, it went from 51.5W to 53.6 west in 6 hours (140/6: 23.333 etc...)
946. SavannahStorm 8:14 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting StSimonsIslandGAGuy:
SavannahStorm, do you want to post the 1898 Cat for landfall or shall I? You know you want to :)


No thanks. I'll pass. Don't want to think about it.

Member Since: September 22, 2005 Posts: 18 Comments: 2135
948. fmbill 8:15 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
18z NAM 36hours
Member Since: May 27, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 365
951. Stormchaser2007 8:16 PM GMT on August 31, 2009    
Quoting Ameister12:
94L is heading in to some very heavy shear (30-50 kts).



Im done explaining...
Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15248

Viewing: 901 - 951

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity